«SPIRIT OF PLACE» AS AN INTANGIBLE FACTOR INFLUENCING SPATIAL PLANNING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31650/2786-6696-2024-10-9-16

Keywords:

«spirit of place», intangible factors, spatial planning, urban environment, architecture planning, national identity, spiritual comfort, «architectural code».

Abstract

The article explores the role of the «spirit of place» as an intangible factor in organizing urban spatial planning. It examines the significance of cultural heritage and national identity in shaping urban landscapes, describing how they foster a sense of belonging and attachment to a place. A method is proposed for integrating these factors into the urban planning process, enabling the creation of more sustainable and attractive urban spaces that resonate with historical and cultural contexts.

The concepts of «city spirit», «spiritual comfort», and «architectural code» are analyzed in detail, highlighting their features and interconnections. The «spirit of place» is considered a key element that shapes the unique identity of a location, influencing people's emotional perception and behavior. The importance of considering historical, cultural, religious, and social aspects in the formation of the architectural environment is emphasized.

Special attention is given to intangible aspects such as cultural heritage, traditions, folklore, and spirituality, which need to be integrated into urban planning decisions. This is particularly relevant in the context of post-war city reconstruction, where human needs, social cohesion, and the preservation of national identity should be prioritized.

Methods for using the «spirit of place» to create or transform architectural environments that consider the needs of different population groups and promote the preservation of cultural uniqueness are also proposed. An analysis of contemporary studies reveals the necessity of developing clear recommendations for implementing innovative solutions that take into account the ecological, socio-economic, political-legal, historical, and cultural characteristics of Ukrainian cities. Equally important is the creation of approaches for involving the public in the process of urban space transformation and modeling practical applications of the «spirit of place» concept in architectural design. Integrating these approaches will allow for the creation of comfortable urban spaces with high aesthetic and cultural value, contributing to the formation of a positive city ensemble and enhancing the quality of life for residents. The research emphasizes the importance of preserving historical memory, which will foster a deep sense of national belonging among the Ukrainian people.

The article proposes approaches that can form the basis for creating effective urban development strategies, taking into account the cultural and historical aspects that define the uniqueness of each place.

References

[1] M. Habrel, M. Kosmii, T. Habrel, "Dukhovnyi komfort i dukh mista yak urbanistychnyi fenomen", Prostorovyi rozvytok, no. 3, pp. 173–196, 2023. https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2023.3.173-196

[2] M. Habrel, M. Habrel, L. Forkutsa, "Do pytannia formuvannia bazy znan prostorovoho planuvannia v Ukraini", Mistobuduvannia ta terytorialne planuvannia, no. 84, pp. 6–27, 2023. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2023.84.6-27

[3] V. Timokhin, N. Shebek, "Kontseptualni zasady rozvytku arkhitekturno-mistobudivnoi spadshchyny v etnichnykh rehionakh Ukrainy", Suchasni problemy Arkhitektury ta Mistobuduvannia, no. 69, pp. 184–199, 2024. https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2024.69.184-199

[4] M. Kosmii, "Semiotychnyi kharakter prostorovoi struktury suchasnoho mista: masyv", Komunalne hospodarstvo mist, no. 6, pp. 85–90, 2020. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2020-6-159-85-90

[5] M. Habrel, M. Dobrovolska, "Poshuk kontseptsii vidrodzhennia ta prostorovoho rozvytku Ukrainy i yii rehioniv: pohliad arkhitektora", Mistobuduvannia ta terytorialne planuvannia, no. 80, pp. 59–79, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2022.80.59-79

[6] O. Petrakovska, M. Mykhalova, "Pidkhody do prostorovoho planuvannia: retrospektyva ta suchasnyi stan", Prostorovyi rozvytok, no. 1, pp. 117–128, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2022.1.117-128

[7] M. Habrel, M. Dobrovolska, M. Dobrovolska, L. Forkutsa, "Prostorove planuvannia na lokalnomu rivni v Ukraini", Prostorovyi rozvytok, no. 6, pp. 165–182, 2023. https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2023.6.165-182

[8] M. Habrel, M. Kosmii, M. Habrel, "Nematerialni konteksty v kontseptsii "rozumnoho" mista", Mistobuduvannia ta terytorialne planuvannia, no. 86, pp. 243–260, 2024. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2024.86.243-260

[9] A. Hladka, "Transformatsiia kulturnoho landshaftu Kyieva v period nezalezhnosti Ukrainy", Ukrainski kulturolohichni studii, no. 1(10), pp. 51-56, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2022.1(10).09

[10] M. Parneta, "Landshaftno-prostorovi chynnyky vplyvu na formuvannia mediinosti arkhitektury ta miskykh prostoriv Lvova", Suchasni problemy Arkhitektury ta Mistobuduvannia, no. 64, pp. 105–118, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2022.64.105-118

[11] O. Silnyk, L. Solovii, "Poslidovnist formuvannia kompozytsiino-stylovoho oseredku zhytlovoi zabudovy Lvova", Mistobuduvannia ta terytorialne planuvannia, no. 80, pp. 368–377, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2022.80.368-377

[12] Ya, Balaniuk, "Dosiahnennia ta problemy naukovoho doslidzhennia, zberezhennia ta rozvytku obiektiv arkhitekturno-miskoho budivnytstva kulturnoi spadshchyny Ukrainy", Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Seriia: "Arkhitektura", no. 4(1), pp. 10-20, 2022. https://doi.org/10.23939/sa2022.01.010

[13] S. Buravchenko, "Variatsii stsenarnykh modelei spryiniattia u chasi obiektiv arkhitektury v pishokhidnykh prostorakh", Suchasni problemy Arkhitektury ta Mistobuduvannia, no. 63, pp. 42–66, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2022.63.42-66

[14] M. Kosmii, "Nematerialni chynnyky v prostorovii orhanizatsii ta rozvytku mist", Suchasni problemy Arkhitektury ta Mistobuduvannia, no. 56, pp. 218–233, 2020. https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2020.56.218-233

[15] V. Pryimak, "Perspektyvni tendentsii arkhitekturnoi transformatsii zhytlovo-hromadskykh tsentriv velykykh mist", Suchasni problemy Arkhitektury ta Mistobuduvannia, no. 64, pp. 194–208, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2022.64.194-208

[16] A. Bludov, "Osoblyvosti kontseptualnoho pidkhodu suchasnykh ukrainskykh khudozhnykiv u zhanri miskoho peizazhu", Zbirnyk naukovykh prats "Ukrainska akademiia mystetstva", no. 29, pp. 22-29, 2020. https://doi.org/10.33838/naoma.29.2020.22-29

[17] I. Dyda, "Ukrainski miski tradytsii: aktualnist v umovakh suchasnykh vyklykiv", Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Seriia: "Arkhitektura", no. 4(2), pp. 79-86, 2022. https://doi.org/10.23939/sa2022.02.079

[18] A. Hlushchenko, "Narysy istorii mistobuduvannia v Ukraini ta sviti", Dorohy i mosty, no. 29, pp. 183–197, 2024. https://doi.org/10.36100/dorogimosti2024.29.183

[19] V. Semko, "Stale terytorialno-prostorove planuvannia v konteksti vidnovlennia Ukrainy – vyznachennia, pryntsypy, kryterii ta zavdannia", Prostorovyi rozvytok, no. 1, pp. 254–267, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2022.1.254-267

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

Architecture

How to Cite

«SPIRIT OF PLACE» AS AN INTANGIBLE FACTOR INFLUENCING SPATIAL PLANNING. (2024). MODERN CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURE, 10, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.31650/2786-6696-2024-10-9-16